[85696] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: IPv6 news
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (David Conrad)
Sun Oct 16 01:41:31 2005
In-Reply-To: <g3irvygl39.fsf@sa.vix.com>
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
From: David Conrad <drc@virtualized.org>
Date: Sat, 15 Oct 2005 22:40:53 -0700
To: Paul Vixie <vixie@vix.com>
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu
On Oct 15, 2005, at 9:08 PM, Paul Vixie wrote:
> but when similar things were proposed
> at other meetings, somebody always said "no! we have to have end-to-
> end,
> and if we'd wanted nat-around-every-net we'd've stuck with IPv4."
Hmm.
Is VJ compression considered a violation of the "end-to-end" principle?
Or perhaps I misunderstand (yet again).
Rgds,
-drc
