[85693] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: IPv6 news
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Paul Vixie)
Sun Oct 16 00:08:52 2005
To: nanog@merit.edu
From: Paul Vixie <vixie@vix.com>
Date: 16 Oct 2005 04:08:26 +0000
In-Reply-To: <BCB9300B-8974-4D41-AF51-331C9BA3E8A4@virtualized.org>
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu
drc@virtualized.org (David Conrad) writes:
> On Oct 15, 2005, at 3:27 PM, Tony Li wrote:
> > When we explored site multihoming (not rehoming) in the ways that
> > you seem to suggest, it was effectively a set of coordinated NAT
> > boxes around the periphery of the site. That was rejected quite
> > quickly.
>
> What were the reasons for rejection?
i wasn't there for that meeting. but when similar things were proposed
at other meetings, somebody always said "no! we have to have end-to-end,
and if we'd wanted nat-around-every-net we'd've stuck with IPv4."
--
Paul Vixie
