[85689] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: IPv6 news
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Tony Li)
Sat Oct 15 18:27:30 2005
In-Reply-To: <737344AD-1868-491F-91E3-4F5190BA6189@sackheads.org>
Cc: Daniel Roesen <dr@cluenet.de>, nanog@nanog.org
From: Tony Li <tony.li@tony.li>
Date: Sat, 15 Oct 2005 15:27:01 -0700
To: John Payne <john@sackheads.org>
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu
> I don't have an acceptable solution... however, I am getting tired
> of shim6 being pushed as *the* solution to site rehoming, when at
> best it's an end node rehoming solution.
>
Well, sorry. When we explored site multihoming (not rehoming) in the
ways that you seem to suggest, it was effectively a set of
coordinated NAT boxes around the periphery of the site. That was
rejected quite quickly.
Tony
