[85681] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: IPv6 news
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Tony Li)
Sat Oct 15 15:29:32 2005
In-Reply-To: <65D7A288-FD0D-4EED-BF8A-005FE59C1465@sackheads.org>
Cc: Daniel Roesen <dr@cluenet.de>, nanog@nanog.org
From: Tony Li <tony.li@tony.li>
Date: Sat, 15 Oct 2005 12:29:02 -0700
To: John Payne <john@sackheads.org>
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu
> So the IETF identified 4 reasons to multihome. Of those 4, shim6
> ignores at least 2 of them (operational policy and cost), and so
> far as I can see glosses over load sharing.
If you have a solution that satisfies all requirements, you should
contribute it. Shim6 is indeed a partial solution to the stated
requirements. There was no tractable solution found to all
requirements, and to not solve any of the issues was seen as
basically fatal.
Tony
