[85675] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: IPv6 news
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Paul Jakma)
Sat Oct 15 11:51:01 2005
Date: Sat, 15 Oct 2005 16:53:07 +0100 (IST)
From: Paul Jakma <paul@clubi.ie>
To: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
Cc: Tony Li <tony.li@tony.li>,
"Christopher L.Morrow" <christopher.morrow@mci.com>, nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <17233.8956.357965.239033@roam.psg.com>
Mail-Copies-To: paul@hibernia.jakma.org
Mail-Followup-To: paul@hibernia.jakma.org
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu
On Sat, 15 Oct 2005, Randy Bush wrote:
> it sounds as if you have the mythical separation of locator and
> identifier :-)/2. the problem is that there is likely to be a
> shortage of those locators.
Yes ;^)
Note that it's not 6to4, it's a proper 2001:: /48 delegation via the
SIXXS tunnel-broker, which is mine to use long as ISPs here do not
deploy IPv6 ;).
> one problem with 6to4 is that having all traffic go through
> gateways will not scale well. to support v6-only folk, either the
> number of 6to4 gateways will need to approach the number of dfz
> routers, the dfz routers will run 6to4, or some combination
> thereof.
ACK.
And 6to4 obviously won't fly for long after the 4 tank runs dry.
regards,
--
Paul Jakma paul@clubi.ie paul@jakma.org Key ID: 64A2FF6A
Fortune:
In Hollywood, if you don't have happiness, you send out for it.
-- Rex Reed
