[85645] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: IPv6 news
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Christopher L. Morrow)
Fri Oct 14 23:36:07 2005
Date: Sat, 15 Oct 2005 03:27:45 +0000 (GMT)
From: "Christopher L. Morrow" <christopher.morrow@mci.com>
In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0510141414020.18989-100000@ruby.he.net>
To: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu
On Fri, 14 Oct 2005, Mike Leber wrote:
>
> Right now the evangelists of IPv6 are like "suck it up man". We're
> providing the service, however you've set the expectation in the market
> that the value of IPv6 in addition to IPv4 is zero.
>
> If IPv6 was perceived to have any premimum value (non zero) over IPv4, it
> would fix most all the network build comments that you keep slapping down.
and you are showing that the cost to do v6 is non-zero... so that should
help.
