[85581] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: IPv6 news
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Jared Mauch)
Fri Oct 14 10:45:16 2005
Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2005 10:39:57 -0400
From: Jared Mauch <jared@puck.nether.net>
To: Jeroen Massar <jeroen@unfix.org>
Cc: "Christopher L. Morrow" <christopher.morrow@mci.com>,
nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <1129272087.21574.6.camel@firenze.zurich.ibm.com>
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu
On Fri, Oct 14, 2005 at 08:41:27AM +0200, Jeroen Massar wrote:
> Even then, they could easily do some 'good' tunnels over their own IPv4
> infrastructure, enabling IPv6 at the edges where they connect their
> customers and maybe do some sensible peering and thus providing sensible
> IPv6 transit to their paying customers...
Most people that charge their customers for v6 provide sensible
transit. You can get tunnels from lots of folks for "free", where
it's the cost of your existing bits/packets/pipe.
- jared
--
Jared Mauch | pgp key available via finger from jared@puck.nether.net
clue++; | http://puck.nether.net/~jared/ My statements are only mine.
