[85525] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: IPv6 news
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Church, Chuck)
Thu Oct 13 10:18:53 2005
Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2005 09:15:46 -0500
From: "Church, Chuck" <cchurch@netcogov.com>
To: <nanog@merit.edu>
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu
> If that is devising some sort of NAT for the large percentage of
>customers that don't care, then that may be the direction we need to
take.
Doesn't NAT-PT do just this? If I'm an ISP with a million customers, if
I can use NAT-PT along with a IPV4 block of say /13, that seems like a
win. V4-mapped and V4-Compatible V6 addresses were created for this
purpose, weren't they?
Chuck=20
