[84520] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: CAT5 surge/lightning strike protection recommendations?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (David Lesher)
Wed Sep 14 12:06:27 2005
X-Original-To: wb8foz@panix.com
From: David Lesher <wb8foz@nrk.com>
To: nanog@merit.edu (nanog list)
Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2005 12:04:22 -0400 (EDT)
In-Reply-To: <20050914154832.A60807C71@sm4app04.siteprotect.com> from "Frank Coluccio" at Sep 14, 2005 10:48:32 AM
Reply-To: wb8foz@nrk.com
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu
Speaking on Deep Background, the Press Secretary whispered:
>
>
> re: ""what did your electricians say ..."
>
> Back to lurking in a moment, but I should note that fire and safety code issues
> are so shrouded in matters of locality and jurisdiction, at times, and bound up
> in industry and governmental standards that are so esotric in nature, that the
> typical electrical worker, and I dare say even most licensed electricians and IT
> consultants, are totally unaware of the specifics, or they are given to gross
> misconceptions and half-truths. This is so, not so much due to the complex nature
> of the matter at hand, but due to a lack of regular exposure to it. Nufsed.
And I shall note that:
Safe
Meets local Code
Works reliably
are often antiparallel terms.....
--
A host is a host from coast to coast.................wb8foz@nrk.com
& no one will talk to a host that's close........[v].(301) 56-LINUX
Unless the host (that isn't close).........................pob 1433
is busy, hung or dead....................................20915-1433
