[83617] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: New N.Y. Law Targets Hidden Net LD Tolls
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (David Lesher)
Thu Aug 18 22:08:26 2005
X-Original-To: wb8foz@panix.com
From: David Lesher <wb8foz@nrk.com>
To: nanog@merit.edu (nanog list)
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2005 22:08:24 -0400 (EDT)
In-Reply-To: <20050818190748.60245.qmail@web31804.mail.mud.yahoo.com> from "David Barak" at Aug 18, 2005 12:07:48 PM
Reply-To: wb8foz@nrk.com
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu
Speaking on Deep Background, the Press Secretary whispered:
>
>
> Not unreasonable at all (although personally, I like
> the TX-style "all your long distance are 11D, else
> 10D" approach). Simple consumer protection, similar
> to the <offtopic warning!>
Ahem; MD has to me the most viable approach:
type: local toll
7D NFG NFG
10D OK NFG
11D OK OK
where the defn of toll is "by the minute".
Face it, 7D is dead; and even if overlays had not arrived,
cell phones would have killed it. Once you learn to think 10D,
it's trivial.
But there are some people who are too stubborn and pigheaded^Y^Y^Y
feel differently about this issue...
That said; this is getting OT for NANOG..
--
A host is a host from coast to coast.................wb8foz@nrk.com
& no one will talk to a host that's close........[v].(301) 56-LINUX
Unless the host (that isn't close).........................pob 1433
is busy, hung or dead....................................20915-1433
