|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |
In-Reply-To: <17145.20559.189118.619457@roam.psg.com> Cc: NANOG list <nanog@merit.edu> From: Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch@muada.com> Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2005 10:17:40 +0200 To: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu On 10-aug-2005, at 2:54, Randy Bush wrote: > on this side of the puddles, i think most folk use /126s for p2p > links. > this has been endlessly and loudly debated, but it still seems > extremely > strange to use 18,446,744,073,709,551,616 addresses for a p2p link. Well, if you want to be really environmentally conscious, do away with that /126 too and just use link-locals, with a single global address per router for management and the generation of ICMPs.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |