[83282] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: IPv6 Address Planning
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Elmar K. Bins)
Wed Aug 10 03:51:42 2005
Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2005 09:51:16 +0200
From: "Elmar K. Bins" <elmi@4ever.de>
To: Alexander Koch <koch@tiscali.net>
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <20050810070215.GB23499@shekinah.ip.tiscali.net>
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu
koch@tiscali.net (Alexander Koch) wrote:
[/124]
> Also I cannot help but like how it can be organised with a
> brain that still works on IPv4 or so. 2^4 is 16, so ::zzx0
> up to ::zzxf and, yeah, the next linknet is then ::zzy0 to
> ::zzyf, with y being just x+1.
I second that. I get thoroughly confused every time, there's
an xxxa coming up after a xxx9. I tend to use xx10 first,
then see that it doesn't work, then remember.
Currently we're using /126s on p2p, but I believe a migration
would be in order, considering the small amount of addresses
we are using anyway.
I definitely abstain from /64s. This is wasteful.
Yours,
Elmi.
--
"Begehe nur nicht den Fehler, Meinung durch Sachverstand zu substituieren."
(PLemken, <bu6o7e$e6v0p$2@ID-31.news.uni-berlin.de>)
--------------------------------------------------------------[ ELMI-RIPE ]---
