[82246] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: The whole alternate-root ${STATE}horse
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (william(at)elan.net)
Sat Jul 9 15:06:11 2005
Date: Sat, 9 Jul 2005 12:05:43 -0700 (PDT)
From: "william(at)elan.net" <william@elan.net>
To: "John Palmer (NANOG Acct)" <nanog@adns.net>
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <262901c584b6$b8666600$8001010a@ADNSMICHIGAN.ADNS.NET>
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu
On Sat, 9 Jul 2005, John Palmer (NANOG Acct) wrote:
> Repeat after me - COLLISIONS ARE BAD! We all agree with that.
But you can't avoid collisions with multiple namespaces. This is
exactly why Internet needs IANA - to avoid collisions in TLD names,
used ip addresses, protocol parameters, etc.
What you're doing with separate namespace is as if you took some part
of the currently unused IP space and setup your own BGP peering network
for those using that space with your own registry, but also accepted
routes from Intenet peers on the same router mixing it all up.
--
William Leibzon
Elan Networks
william@elan.net