[82236] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Stephen J. Wilcox)
Sat Jul 9 13:53:40 2005
Date: Sat, 9 Jul 2005 18:49:53 +0100 (BST)
From: "Stephen J. Wilcox" <steve@telecomplete.co.uk>
To: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
Cc: Alexei Roudnev <alex@relcom.net>,
"Christopher L. Morrow" <christopher.morrow@mci.com>,
NANOG <nanog@merit.edu>, Brad Knowles <brad@stop.mail-abuse.org>
In-Reply-To: <200507091726.j69HQcnS005337@turing-police.cc.vt.edu>
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu
On Sat, 9 Jul 2005, Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu wrote:
> On Sat, 09 Jul 2005 18:14:48 BST, "Stephen J. Wilcox" said:
> > forget the talk of juniper t320s in the core.. you are talking about the
> > problem caused by multihoming and multihoming prefixes are not originated
> > typically by such large and expensive routers but by small cheap systems at
> > the edge.
>
> Yes, but how well does that multihoming work if the Junipers in the core
> can't/ won't carry your announcement? Currently, multihoming only works
> because it's cost-shifting - the pain of carrying the announcement is felt by
> the carriers, not the originators.
sorry, my point was perhaps unclear.. it was suggested that the increasing
requirements to operate routers would be a natural prevention to multihoming.. i
am saying that it is not the multihomers at the edge feeling that pain it is
those already in the core
Steve
