[82230] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu)
Sat Jul 9 13:27:14 2005
To: "Stephen J. Wilcox" <steve@telecomplete.co.uk>
Cc: Alexei Roudnev <alex@relcom.net>,
"Christopher L. Morrow" <christopher.morrow@mci.com>,
NANOG <nanog@merit.edu>, Brad Knowles <brad@stop.mail-abuse.org>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sat, 09 Jul 2005 18:14:48 BST."
<Pine.LNX.4.44.0507091813340.11569-100000@server2.tcw.telecomplete.net>
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
Date: Sat, 09 Jul 2005 13:26:37 -0400
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu
--==_Exmh_1120929996_8886P
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Sat, 09 Jul 2005 18:14:48 BST, "Stephen J. Wilcox" said:
> forget the talk of juniper t320s in the core.. you are talking about the problem
> caused by multihoming and multihoming prefixes are not originated typically by
> such large and expensive routers but by small cheap systems at the edge.
Yes, but how well does that multihoming work if the Junipers in the core can't/
won't carry your announcement? Currently, multihoming only works because it's
cost-shifting - the pain of carrying the announcement is felt by the carriers,
not the originators.
--==_Exmh_1120929996_8886P
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001
iD8DBQFC0AjMcC3lWbTT17ARAhCSAKD1lb4z4FgP6ULgjLw1WEB2GM0z1QCgjwpF
h6RVJ1z7pIHU709R4pd8g5Y=
=sz4G
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--==_Exmh_1120929996_8886P--
