[81946] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Enable BIND cache server to resolve chinese domain name?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Tony Finch)
Mon Jul 4 08:45:46 2005
Date: Mon, 4 Jul 2005 13:44:50 +0100
From: Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at>
To: Michael.Dillon@btradianz.com
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <OF0EE8F2A5.807A123B-ON80257034.0043B2CA-80257034.00444AF5@radianz.com>
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu
On Mon, 4 Jul 2005 Michael.Dillon@btradianz.com wrote:
>
> They are battling it out in the marketplace and one of the IDN solutions
> will evolve to the point where the market considers it clearly superior.
> This may be the IETF-blessed solution and it may not. One only has to
> browse through the RFC archives to see that RFC status is no guarantee
> that something will be widely adopted.
>
> Personally, I think that the Internet is too young and we have too
> little experience with multilingual naming to engineer an
> Internationalised Domain Naming solution that solves the problem once
> and for all. This means that we should be ready for more than one
> iteration to get to the solution.
We should be careful to distinguish between i18n and localization. These
private alternative DNS roots are specific to a particular set of users,
so they implement DNS l10n which is not appropriate for a system that is
supposed to be international. Slogan: localization is balkanization.
Tony.
--
f.a.n.finch <dot@dotat.at> http://dotat.at/
BISCAY: WEST 5 OR 6 BECOMING VARIABLE 3 OR 4. SHOWERS AT FIRST. MODERATE OR
GOOD.
