[81976] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: Enable BIND cache server to resolve chinese domain name?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Hannigan, Martin)
Fri Jul 8 15:27:51 2005
Date: Tue, 5 Jul 2005 14:32:16 -0400
From: "Hannigan, Martin" <hannigan@verisign.com>
To: <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-nanog@merit.edu [mailto:owner-nanog@merit.edu]On Behalf Of
> Steve Gibbard
> Sent: Monday, July 04, 2005 1:20 AM
> To: nanog@nanog.org
> Subject: Re: Enable BIND cache server to resolve chinese domain name?=20
>=20
>=20
>=20
> On Mon, 4 Jul 2005, Mark Andrews wrote:
>=20
[ SNIP ]
=20
> That doesn't mean a competing system wouldn't work, for those who are=20
> using it. They'd just be limited in who they could talk to, and that=20
> generally wouldn't be very appealing.
Are you just making noise here, Steve? That doesn't really
say anything outside of status quo.
> That said, a big country implementing a new DNS root on a=20
> national scale=20
> may not have that problem. The telecom world is already full=20
> of systems=20
> that don't cross national borders. In the US case, think of=20
> all the cell=20
> phones that have international dialing turned off by default,=20
That's a poor example. That's between the subscriber and their
carrier, not a technical limitation.=20
> and all the=20
> 800 numbers whose owners probably aren't at all bothered by their=20
> inability to receive calls from other countries.
That's also a poor example since there are work arounds for
this technical issue.
>=20
> A system that would limit my ability to talk to people in=20
> other countries=20
> doesn't sound very appealing to me. =20
I know. I know. Don't feed the trolls.
-M<
