[81928] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Enable BIND cache server to resolve chinese domain name?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (David A. Ulevitch)
Sun Jul 3 23:06:11 2005
In-Reply-To: <014101c58041$35216de0$8001010a@ADNSMICHIGAN.ADNS.NET>
From: "David A. Ulevitch" <davidu@everydns.net>
Date: Sun, 3 Jul 2005 20:05:31 -0700
To: nanog@merit.edu
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu
On Jul 3, 2005, at 7:36 PM, John Palmer (NANOG Acct) wrote:
> ICANN has no right to claim that they are the authority for the
> namespace.
> They are NOT.
Horse == dead.
> Also note the word PUBLIC in PUBLIC-ROOT.
My i18n must be broken. All I see is SNAKE-OIL.
-david ulevitch
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Mark Andrews" <Mark_Andrews@isc.org>
> To: "Joe Shen" <joe_hznm@yahoo.com.sg>
> Cc: <bind-users@isc.org>; "NANGO" <nanog@merit.edu>
> Sent: Sunday, July 03, 2005 9:12 PM
> Subject: Re: Enable BIND cache server to resolve chinese domain name?
>
>
>
>>
>>
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Some of our customer complaint they could not visit
>>> back to their web site, which use chinese domain name.
>>> I google the net and found some one recommend to use
>>> public-root.com servers in hint file.
>>>
>>> I found domain name like xn--8pru44h.xn--55qx5d could
>>> not be resolved either.
>>>
>>> Our cache server runs BIND9.3.1 with root server list
>>> from rs.internic.net.
>>>
>>> Do I need to modify our cache server configuration to
>>> enable it?
>>>
>>> regards
>>>
>>> Joe
>>>
>>
>> Only if you wish to do all your other customers a disfavour
>> by configuring your caching servers to support a private
>> namespace then yes.
>>
>> I would have thought the Site Finder experience would have
>> stopped people from thinking that they can arbitarially add
>> names to to the public DNS.
>>
>> Mark
>> --
>> Mark Andrews, ISC
>> 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
>> PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: Mark_Andrews@isc.org
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> !DSPAM:42c8a103122651094118373!
>
>
