[81903] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu)
Sun Jul 3 11:48:59 2005
To: codewarrior@cuseeme.de
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sun, 03 Jul 2005 17:16:57 +0200."
<6772B288-2925-4733-8BAD-CC2D6482A7AD@cuseeme.de>
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
Date: Sun, 03 Jul 2005 11:45:12 -0400
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu
--==_Exmh_1120405512_13223P
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Sun, 03 Jul 2005 17:16:57 +0200, codewarrior@cuseeme.de said:
> On Jul 3, 2005, at 5:01 PM, Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu wrote:
> > On Sun, 03 Jul 2005 10:15:10 +0200, Peter Dambier said:
> >> People will want IPv9 with total gouvernement control. Especially
> >> in China
> >> and the US.
> > The fact that something is neither available nor technically feasible has
> > never stopped people from wanting it...
> this was made as an example and would mean we are stuck here , aren t
> we?
No, it means that we need to progress in directions that are available and
technically feasible.
I recently went to a car dealer *wanting* to spend $400 on a 2005 car that
got 4,000 miles to the gallon and guaranteed perfect safety in any conceivable
crash. Of course, said car is neither available nor technically feasible.
That didn't stop the salesman and myself from coming to acceptable terms
on a slightly older Toyota Camry for slightly more money, said Camry being
both available and technically feasible...
--==_Exmh_1120405512_13223P
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001
iD8DBQFCyAgIcC3lWbTT17ARAsMPAJ48RnZkv1xzbGJWM2OGIelormgk4ACeKv4s
6ahlqO4VxGRLFaHEsZCwmag=
=O+Jg
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--==_Exmh_1120405512_13223P--
