[81953] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu)
Fri Jul 8 15:12:50 2005
To: Brad Knowles <brad@stop.mail-abuse.org>
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 04 Jul 2005 00:37:10 +0200."
<p06200716beee17c46ce3@[10.0.1.3]>
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
Date: Mon, 04 Jul 2005 14:25:51 -0400
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu
--==_Exmh_1120501551_13223P
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Mon, 04 Jul 2005 00:37:10 +0200, Brad Knowles said:
> But just because IPv6 has problems doesn't mean that it doesn't
> solve the fundamental address space problem in IPv4, and doesn't mean
> that it is anything less than the best available alternative.
OK, I'll bite.. :)
Is there another alternative running around wearing a t-shirt that says
"I'm the best there is, but I'm not available"? ;)
--==_Exmh_1120501551_13223P
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001
iD8DBQFCyX8vcC3lWbTT17ARAje8AJ0bpDAShKcAGiooYXRv2ER/jxu+mwCfTq0Q
XnvCkGp/HVgYVqV+cXH/G4M=
=LCO4
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--==_Exmh_1120501551_13223P--
