[81624] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: OSPF -vs- ISIS
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Fergie (Paul Ferguson))
Tue Jun 21 11:07:01 2005
From: "Fergie (Paul Ferguson)" <fergdawg@netzero.net>
Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2005 14:58:27 GMT
To: vgill@vijaygill.com
Cc: pzdevans@gmail.com, nanog@merit.edu
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu
Isn't that because Dave re-wrote all of the IS-IS code? ;-)
- ferg
-- vijay gill <vgill@vijaygill.com> wrote:
Daniel, in short, we've found ISIS to be slightly easier to maintain and
run, with slightly more peace of mind in terms of securitiy than OSPF.
Performance and stability wise, no major difference that was noticable.
For more information, see the talk by Dave Katz at
http://www.nanog.org/mtg-0006/katz.html
Also, AOL's experience in switching from OSPF to ISIS is covered at
http://www.nanog.org/mtg-0310/gill.html
the PDF on that page is actually an older version. The full version I
used at NANOG is available at http://www.vijaygill.com/oi.pdf
/vijay
--
"Fergie", a.k.a. Paul Ferguson
Engineering Architecture for the Internet
fergdawg@netzero.net or fergdawg@sbcglobal.net
ferg's tech blog: http://fergdawg.blogspot.com/
