[80277] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Owen DeLong)
Thu Apr 28 00:56:09 2005
Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2005 21:55:11 -0700
From: Owen DeLong <owen@delong.com>
To: Steve Sobol <sjsobol@justthe.net>,
Bill Stewart <nonobvious@gmail.com>
Cc: North American Networking and Offtopic Gripes List <nanog@nanog.org>
In-Reply-To: <427040E3.8080205@JustThe.net>
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu
--==========39A318DBD750289BD812==========
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
>
> What's rDNS for the ip address(es) assigned to you?
>
I don't know about him, but, on my ADSL connection, it is controlled
by my nameservers:
;; ANSWER SECTION:
10.159.192.in-addr.arpa. 86400 IN NS ns.rop.edu.
10.159.192.in-addr.arpa. 86400 IN NS ns.delong.sj.ca.us.
>
>> I'm not highly in favor of blocking
>> traffic from broadband users
>> and killing the end-to-end principle that makes the Internet work,
>
> I'm not in favor of mindless blocking of entire netblocks that may
> contain stuff that should not be blocked, but broadband providers are
> notorious for (e.g.) lumping residential customers that can be blocked,
> with no collateral damage, in the same netblocks as business customers
> who need to run Internet facing servers, and (e.g.) not providing an easy
> way to differentiate between the two classes of customer in the first
> place.
Who are you to decide that there is no damage to blocking residential
customers? I'm a residential customer, but, I have a number of
servers running, and, a port 25 block would be very destructive to
the operation of my mailserver. Why should an ISP decide what a =
residential
customer can or can't do with their internet connection. (This is not
an advocation for abandoning TOS or allowing abuse. I am talking about
within the confines of legitimate internet use, such as hosting a web
site (or even several), running nameservers, mail server(s), etc.)
Owen
--=20
If this message was not signed with gpg key 0FE2AA3D, it's probably
a forgery.
--==========39A318DBD750289BD812==========
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (Darwin)
iD8DBQFCcGyzn5zKWQ/iqj0RAjbRAJ9Yiuu2XANVV2wAIDBkEmCumLkOGwCfRj3X
KHsEZbuX0e6sB52rdUy5Cxo=
=LI2l
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--==========39A318DBD750289BD812==========--