[80276] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: Paul Wilson and Geoff Huston of APNIC on IP address allocation ITU v/s ICANN etc

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Suresh Ramasubramanian)
Wed Apr 27 22:21:19 2005

Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2005 07:50:50 +0530
From: Suresh Ramasubramanian <ops.lists@gmail.com>
Reply-To: Suresh Ramasubramanian <ops.lists@gmail.com>
To: Scott Weeks <surfer@mauigateway.com>
Cc: Nanog Mailing list <nanog@merit.edu>
In-Reply-To: <20050427093821.K32383-100000@www.mauigateway.com>
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu


On 4/28/05, Scott Weeks <surfer@mauigateway.com> wrote:
> Probably, I'll have to research through the ITU site to find out this
> information, but surely these arguments have been presented to the ITU
> while they're making their choice of how to proceed with IP address
> allocation.  Does anyone have a couple of links that support their
> position for doing it the "national allocations" way?

Poke around http://www.nro.net for a detailed correspondence +
submissions on both sides between the RIRs and ITU-T

--=20
Suresh Ramasubramanian (ops.lists@gmail.com)

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post