[79670] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Auerbach Accuses ICANN Board of Dereliction of Duty on IP Allocation
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu)
Wed Apr 13 16:51:03 2005
To: Dave Crocker <dcrocker@bbiw.net>
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 13 Apr 2005 09:24:13 PDT."
<200541392413.607467@bbprime>
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2005 16:50:19 -0400
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu
--==_Exmh_1113425419_13742P
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Wed, 13 Apr 2005 09:24:13 PDT, Dave Crocker said:
(citing out of order to make a point...)
> The input turns out to be markedly minimal, where he comprises 25% of it.
Whether Karl is in fact right or a raving net.loon, there is indeed something very
wrong with the process if he's 25% of the input.
> He even cites the absence of protracted, public dialogue as 'proof' that input
> is being ignored.
Exactly. This is the Internet, remember? Even a mostly-obvious statement like
"ISPs should prevent their customers from leaking rfc1918-sourced addresses" will
start a flamefest. So the *lack* of a flame-fest regarding *any* action taken
by ICANN should tell you something about the perception of ICANN - even the
majority of net.loons have learned it's not worth the effort....
--==_Exmh_1113425419_13742P
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001
iD8DBQFCXYYLcC3lWbTT17ARAi4mAJ480dH5Cer7H2opc/+016Zg9RrcewCgkqWS
v0wPYsT2onjW4+4cxpR7jsM=
=Q5S2
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--==_Exmh_1113425419_13742P--
