[79667] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Auerbach Accuses ICANN Board of Dereliction of Duty on IP Allocation
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Eric A. Hall)
Wed Apr 13 14:56:02 2005
Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2005 14:55:35 -0400
From: "Eric A. Hall" <ehall@ehsco.com>
To: Michael.Dillon@radianz.com
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <OF411981BD.2BCF4E0E-ON80256FE2.0038261F-80256FE2.0038CCF9@radianz.com>
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu
On 4/13/2005 6:20 AM, Michael.Dillon@radianz.com wrote:
> ICANN is not perfect but it is hard to see anything
> wrong with this particular action.
what's got to be wrong about it? ICANNwatch is the unelected opposition
party to ICANN's unelected majority party. Whatever ICANN does, ICANNwatch
finds somebody who opposes it or comes out and opposes it themselves if
they must, cause that's what opposition parties do. Being right or wrong
or in the service of the community has nothing to do with it.
--
Eric A. Hall http://www.ehsco.com/
Internet Core Protocols http://www.oreilly.com/catalog/coreprot/
