[77241] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Association of Trustworthy Roots?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Christopher L. Morrow)
Sun Jan 16 22:23:07 2005
Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2005 03:22:17 +0000 (GMT)
From: "Christopher L. Morrow" <christopher.morrow@mci.com>
In-reply-to: <20050117013625.GE1397307@hiwaay.net>
To: Chris Adams <cmadams@hiwaay.net>
Cc: North American Network Operators Group <nanog@merit.edu>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
On Sun, 16 Jan 2005, Chris Adams wrote:
>
> Once upon a time, Christopher L. Morrow <christopher.morrow@mci.com> said:
> > That process/procedure is in place for a good reason,
> > circumventing it will lead to problems in the long run. Do you circumvent
> > for MS, for AOL, for ATT? At what point do you draw the line? My home
> > business of pot painting?
>
> If the proper procedure was circumvented in the first place (which
> appears to be the case with panix.com), then it should be circumvented
> to repair the damage as fast as possible.
If it can be proven to have been cicumvented, sure. I don't think anything
beyond conjecture about that has been said 'publicly' yet, has it?
