[76871] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: IPv6, IPSEC and DoS
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu)
Sun Jan 2 17:22:54 2005
To: Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch@muada.com>
Cc: NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sun, 02 Jan 2005 11:26:09 +0100."
<B8327874-5CA8-11D9-95A1-000A95CD987A@muada.com>
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
Date: Sun, 02 Jan 2005 17:22:11 -0500
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
--==_Exmh_378523364P
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Sun, 02 Jan 2005 11:26:09 +0100, Iljitsch van Beijnum said:
> Really? So ARP uses SEND? (
> http://www.ietf.org/html.charters/OLD/send-charter.html )
Neighbor Discovery doesn't *USE* SEND yet, either....
I seem to be unable to find the RFC numbers for SEND (except 3756 for the
threat model). Lacking those, and lacking widespread support for said RFCs
across both router vendors and end-user boxes, I have to call the *current
deployable* Neighbor Discovery as doing the same thing as ARP - "essentially
nothing".
What release of IOS did SEND become stable in? What release of other router
software did it become stable? What release(s) of Windows, Linux, and Solaris
did the support become stable?
Yes, a year or two down the road, there will hopefully be deployable code.
But not now.
--==_Exmh_378523364P
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001
iD8DBQFB2HQScC3lWbTT17ARAu5mAJ44m7oOY4Kp8MSgeGUuHdC1goYUCQCg8Vyk
DIwbA0QqWp6jSK8hqwvpzPc=
=dQc8
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--==_Exmh_378523364P--
