[76268] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: [OT] Re: Banned on NANOG
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Alex Bligh)
Sat Dec 4 13:35:00 2004
Date: Sat, 04 Dec 2004 18:34:16 +0000
From: Alex Bligh <alex@alex.org.uk>
Reply-To: Alex Bligh <alex@alex.org.uk>
To: Paul Vixie <vixie@vix.com>, nanog@merit.edu
Cc: Alex Bligh <alex@alex.org.uk>
In-Reply-To: <g3u0r2arvk.fsf@sa.vix.com>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
--On 04 December 2004 17:35 +0000 Paul Vixie <vixie@vix.com> wrote:
> third and last, there are a number of principles up for grabs right now,
> and the folks who want to grab them aren't universal in their motives or
> goals. some folks think that rules are bad. others think that susan is
> bad or that merit is bad. some say that rules are ok if the community has
> visibility and ultimate control.
I'd add: if people don't like NANOG, demand a full refund for your
year's membership. Then go set up your own mail-server and work out your own
moderation policies. If you do a better job, you'll win clueful
subscribers.
Alex
