[75938] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: A6/DNAME not needed for v6 renumbering [Re: who gets a /32 [Re:
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (william(at)elan.net)
Mon Nov 29 02:11:00 2004
Date: Sun, 28 Nov 2004 23:35:57 -0800 (PST)
From: "william(at)elan.net" <william@elan.net>
To: Pekka Savola <pekkas@netcore.fi>
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0411290847010.26365@netcore.fi>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
On Mon, 29 Nov 2004, Pekka Savola wrote:
> 6. Acknowledgments
> [...]
> Some took it on themselves to convince the authors that the concept
> of network renumbering as a normal or frequent procedure is daft.
[Note: check spell error - "draft" not "daft"]
> Their comments, if they result in improved address management
> practices in networks, may be the best contribution this note has to
> offer.
<sarcasm>
Oh? Is that "Acknolidgement" the only contribution IETF has to offer in
regards to renumbering? How pathetic!
> To paraphrase Randy from a couple of years ago: 'Ocean: do not drain.'
Is that the same as "Ocean: do not cross"? I guess we're lucky Columbus
did not have same attitude to life as Randy...
</sarcasm>
--
William Leibzon
Elan Networks
william@elan.net
