[75946] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: A6/DNAME not needed for v6 renumbering [Re: who gets a /32 [Re:
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Owen DeLong)
Mon Nov 29 04:46:47 2004
Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2004 01:42:39 -0800
From: Owen DeLong <owen@delong.com>
To: "william(at)elan.net" <william@elan.net>,
Pekka Savola <pekkas@netcore.fi>
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0411282323440.13169-100000@sokol.elan.net>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
--==========810C8963D52A09BFF581==========
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
--On Sunday, November 28, 2004 11:35 PM -0800 "william(at)elan.net"=20
<william@elan.net> wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, 29 Nov 2004, Pekka Savola wrote:
>
>> 6. Acknowledgments
>> [...]
>> Some took it on themselves to convince the authors that the concept
>> of network renumbering as a normal or frequent procedure is daft.
> [Note: check spell error - "draft" not "daft"]
>
No, I think "daft" is the word intended in this case. It is a synonym
for "incompetent" or "stupid".
I don't happen to agree with it, but, I think that is what was intended.
Owen
--=20
If it wasn't crypto-signed, it probably didn't come from me.
--==========810C8963D52A09BFF581==========
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (Darwin)
iD8DBQFBqu8Qn5zKWQ/iqj0RAjQUAJ9TMKxy04nCGBOyBFK9BhursYevpwCeJZJL
SsUP/wOiKAHBtghibnka6zA=
=wKfF
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--==========810C8963D52A09BFF581==========--
