[75918] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: BBC does IPv6 ;) (Was: large multi-site enterprises and PI
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Owen DeLong)
Sun Nov 28 13:50:39 2004
Date: Sun, 28 Nov 2004 10:45:54 -0800
From: Owen DeLong <owen@delong.com>
To: Henning Brauer <hb-nanog@bsws.de>, nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <20041128122105.GF10057@nudo.bsws.de>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
--==========2E561D509CFB9971A52B==========
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
--On Sunday, November 28, 2004 1:21 PM +0100 Henning Brauer=20
<hb-nanog@bsws.de> wrote:
>
> * Cliff Albert <cliff@oisec.net> [2004-11-28 13:13]:
>> Therefore I also agree with daniel that there is not really a problem
>> with the 1 ASN =3D=3D 1 IPv6 Prefix.
>
> unless I miss something in that proposal that means that we'll see a
> dramatic increase in ASNs - I mean, it is not like only organizations
> with an ASN assigned have v4 space now. If they have their portable
> address space now, why should they suddenly accept that they had to
> renumber when changing providers?
>
Why should they go to v6 at all?
Owen
--=20
If it wasn't crypto-signed, it probably didn't come from me.
--==========2E561D509CFB9971A52B==========
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (Darwin)
iD8DBQFBqhzin5zKWQ/iqj0RAr4xAJ4/I1mKZ1haMByskmgdroPNcPmRtwCbBERi
6cGWEPoPo5uofy1+QewFZNQ=
=TFhk
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--==========2E561D509CFB9971A52B==========--
