[75917] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: BBC does IPv6 ;) (Was: large multi-site enterprises and PI
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Owen DeLong)
Sun Nov 28 13:46:55 2004
Date: Sun, 28 Nov 2004 10:45:12 -0800
From: Owen DeLong <owen@delong.com>
To: Cliff Albert <cliff@oisec.net>, Pekka Savola <pekkas@netcore.fi>
Cc: Daniel Roesen <dr@cluenet.de>, nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <20041128121324.GA15045@oisec.net>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
--==========C2475EB187ADAAECB6D0==========
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
>
> My preference lies in making the policies a lot stricter, and actively
> verifying current delegations. I see a lot of ASN's requested just for
> fun with no real motive behind it.
I think this is already the case, at least with ARIN... I have definitely
had to thoroughly justify each and every ASN I have received from them in
the last 2 years (total of 6). In fact, I think it was actually harder
to get an ASN than to get v4 prefixes in that same time period.
I think it is not unreasonable to work towards a policy of 1 AS gets
at least one IPv6 prefix and no AS can originate more than one prefix
longer than /32 (/33-/64). I think that combined with the current
policies towards ASN issuance is probably reasonable routing table
size.
Owen
--=20
If it wasn't crypto-signed, it probably didn't come from me.
--==========C2475EB187ADAAECB6D0==========
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (Darwin)
iD8DBQFBqhy4n5zKWQ/iqj0RAozuAJ95Utrt243bmyI+VLIEYmLGzcIajACgjRWd
tbWK9+FIGwYNIX5rRhcUEjs=
=rB/T
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--==========C2475EB187ADAAECB6D0==========--
