[75779] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: Opinions of recent ITU Comments on the Management of IP Addresses

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (bmanning@vacation.karoshi.com)
Tue Nov 23 13:20:49 2004

Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2004 18:20:24 +0000
From: bmanning@vacation.karoshi.com
To: Owen DeLong <owen@delong.com>
Cc: Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch@muada.com>,
	Vince Hoffman <jhary@unsane.co.uk>, nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <2147483647.1101201808@imac-en0.delong.sj.ca.us>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu


On Tue, Nov 23, 2004 at 09:23:28AM -0800, Owen DeLong wrote:
> Of course, then, the developing countries (and, more importantly, the 
> countries
> with large viral or spammer populations) are then faced with the question
> of whether anyone will route their prefixes.  Won't that make the ITU happy.
> 
> Owen

	well... some evidence that folks can/do route prefixes that
	host large viral/spammer populations can be found here:

	http://postini.com/stats/

	anyone want to blackhole the east-coast of the USA?

--bill

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post