[75757] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: large multi-site enterprises and PI prefix [Re: who gets a /32 [Re: IPV6 renumbering painless?]]
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (bmanning@vacation.karoshi.com)
Mon Nov 22 19:56:12 2004
Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2004 00:55:44 +0000
From: bmanning@vacation.karoshi.com
To: Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch@muada.com>
Cc: bmanning@vacation.karoshi.com,
North American Noise and Off-topic Gripes <nanog@merit.edu>
In-Reply-To: <D550DDEB-3CE2-11D9-992B-000A95CD987A@muada.com>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
> If all active ASes did this we'd have a 400k routing table. So please
> no PI in IPv6, not even for large enterprises.
er... we'd have no such thing. -you- might, you get to
have total control over what prefixes are instanciated in
-your- router. you seem to have the unmitigated gaul to
presume to tell me what i may or may not place in -my-
routing table. neither you nor the IETF has that right.
--bill
