[75756] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: who gets a /32 [Re: IPV6 renumbering painless?]
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Iljitsch van Beijnum)
Mon Nov 22 19:12:22 2004
In-Reply-To: <20041122165303.F059713E12@sa.vix.com>
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
From: Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch@muada.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2004 01:11:51 +0100
To: Paul Vixie <paul@vix.com>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
On 22-nov-04, at 17:53, Paul Vixie wrote:
> so there. those are my views. aren't you glad you asked?
Sure.
It seems to me though, that if renumbering is such a problem, maybe we
should deal with it directly rather than dump the fallout in the three
most critical parts of the internet machinery.
>> It's wrong if these issues that have global impact are decided
>> regionally.
> yes. i understand that the acid rain people, the ozone layer people,
> the
> ice cap people, the whale people, and the ocean oxygen level people,
> all
> have that same complaint. human nature on a grand scale isn't always
> pretty.
Well if you feel you need to take your cues from environmental
semi-criminals, obviously there isn't much that I can say to stop you.
I'm thoroughly unhappy with the way this is handled at RIPE (regardless
of the outcome) and I'm not about to go sponsor the airline industry
some more in order to experience the same frustration in APNIC, LACNIC
and ARIN meetings. If we're going to make stupid decisions we might as
well streamline the process to make them as efficiently as possible...
