[75596] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: who gets a /32 [Re: IPV6 renumbering painless?]
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu)
Thu Nov 18 11:35:28 2004
To: North American Noise and Off-topic Gripes <nanog@merit.edu>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 18 Nov 2004 10:29:10 EST."
<200411181529.iAIFTAUm022258@turing-police.cc.vt.edu>
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2004 11:35:04 -0500
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
--==_Exmh_935700901P
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Thu, 18 Nov 2004 10:29:10 EST, Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu said:
> The point is that Randy was wrong when he said there weren't any v6 ISPs
Citation error on my part. I missed a level of > in the original:
On 11/18/04 5:44 AM, "Mike Leber" <mleber@he.net> wrote:
> On Sun, 14 Nov 2004, Randy Bush wrote:
>>> in august 2002 there were no v6 isp's.
Sorry. Randy was quoting somebody else...
--==_Exmh_935700901P
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001
iD8DBQFBnM83cC3lWbTT17ARAhVoAKCkHBAqJUYTkx9tXtqmnudu0aqI9QCg6/hZ
ilT5rO2+83QhsufhlkpBZK4=
=xFcG
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--==_Exmh_935700901P--
