[75595] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: who gets a /32 [Re: IPV6 renumbering painless?]
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Jeroen Massar)
Thu Nov 18 11:13:38 2004
From: Jeroen Massar <jeroen@unfix.org>
To: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
Cc: North American Noise and Off-topic Gripes <nanog@merit.edu>
In-Reply-To: <200411181529.iAIFTAUm022258@turing-police.cc.vt.edu>
Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2004 17:12:55 +0100
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
--=-ih/GW7GEk7zn0TJW505u
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Thu, 2004-11-18 at 10:29 -0500, Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu wrote:
> On Thu, 18 Nov 2004 09:18:22 EST, Christian Kuhtz said:
>=20
> > So, again, somebody says they're selling it.. And without wanting to so=
und
> > like a flame.. what volume of native, non-tunnel IPv6 traffic do you se=
e and
> > what applications is it? Could you throw those of us a bone who are st=
ill
> > scratching our heads as to what business cases support this? ;)
>=20
> The point is that Randy was wrong when he said there weren't any v6 ISPs
> in 2002, because at least some were doing it a year before that.
>=20
> For *THAT* matter, I've heard a lot of people over on the main IETF list
> in the last week or so stating that SMTP is only 1-2% of many places' tot=
al
> bandwidth usage. So why don't we all just cut *THAT* off because there's
> no business case to support *THAT* either? :)
The business case of about 80% of the ISP's is Pr0n & W4R3z (or what
spelling is 'in' this year?)
But.... it is not illegal to make adverts for say "Downloading the
newest movies over a cool 8mbit DSL line". But downloading it itself is
of course. Might be analogous to providing a busservice to the crack
dealers mansion.
In short.... when those porn providers join the boat with the warez
providers IPv6 will have a lot more traffic for sure.
Operational part: most (all?) of the IETF servers don't support IPv6,
guess where they are located ;)
Greets,
Jeroen
--=-ih/GW7GEk7zn0TJW505u
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Jeroen Massar / http://unfix.org/~jeroen/
iD8DBQBBnMoHKaooUjM+fCMRAofTAKCEVRnybwMu615Cj/Y0KpgoK8YwDACcDylq
b1tGg7gZ1dVkgSk3Wt9F2Do=
=jphy
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-ih/GW7GEk7zn0TJW505u--
