[75477] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: The Cidr Report
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Hank Nussbacher)
Sat Nov 13 13:47:58 2004
Date: Sat, 13 Nov 2004 20:38:24 +0200
To: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>, cidr-report@potaroo.net
From: Hank Nussbacher <hank@mail.iucc.ac.il>
Cc: nanog@merit.edu, eof-list@ripe.net, apops@apops.net,
routing-wg@ripe.net, afnog@afnog.org, swinog@swinog.ch
In-Reply-To: <16789.15746.922768.24886@ran.psg.com>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
At 02:47 PM 12-11-04 -0800, Randy Bush wrote:
> > ASnum NetsNow NetsAggr NetGain % Gain Description
> >
> > AS18566 751 6 745 99.2% CVAD Covad Communications
> > AS4134 825 178 647 78.4% CHINANET-BACKBONE
> > No.31,Jin-rong Street
> > AS4323 794 223 571 71.9% TWTC Time Warner Telecom
> > AS6197 814 430 384 47.2% BNS-14 BellSouth Network
> > Solutions, Inc
> > AS22773 401 17 384 95.8% CXA Cox Communications Inc.
> > AS27364 413 45 368 89.1% ARMC Armstrong Cable Services
> > AS701 1230 884 346 28.1% UU UUNET Technologies, Inc.
> > AS22909 412 81 331 80.3% CMCS Comcast Cable
> > Communications, Inc.
>
>are these numbers what i think, but hope not, they are?
>
>e.g. is AS18566 the origin AS for 751 prefixes that could be
>collapsed to 6?
Barry and me tried:
http://www.nanog.org/mtg-0302/cidr.html
Covad was first contacted Aug 2002:
>ASnum NetsNow NetsCIDR NetGain % Gain Description
>AS18566 264 4 260 98.5% COVAD Covad Communications
But Covad was just one. I used to quietly contact these "pollutors" along
with a few others who helped out (Barry and Terry) but as of a year ago I'm
giving my 5-10 hours of volunteerism per month to nsp-sec.
-Hank
>if not, then perhaps the report could use some work.
>
>if so, then
> o why are providers indulging is such extremely sick
> behavior
> o and who can hack the perl to generate filters for this
> so we can listen only to the aggregates
>
>randy
