[75464] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: The Cidr Report
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Roy)
Sat Nov 13 10:19:05 2004
From: "Roy" <garlic@garlic.com>
To: <cidr-report@potaroo.net>, <nanog@merit.edu>
Date: Sat, 13 Nov 2004 07:18:09 -0800
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.58.0411130328190.28357@sharpie.argfrp.us.uu.net>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
You have jumped to the conclusion that a customer of the cable company is
not multi-homed. Bad assumption. I can tell you that there are multihomed
customers behind what you would normally think of as a cable company.
Roy Engehausen
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-nanog@merit.edu [mailto:owner-nanog@merit.edu]On Behalf Of
Christopher L. Morrow
Sent: Friday, November 12, 2004 7:31 PM
To: Randy Bush
Cc: cidr-report@potaroo.net; nanog@merit.edu
Subject: Re: The Cidr Report
....
Of these listed 4 are cable companies, is there something in the cable
modem networking that requires deaggregated routes beyond their borders?
Is the problem that they might have seperate 'networks' for their regional
parts and leak more specifics for these parts along with 'backup' routes
via aggregates?
....
