[72678] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: VeriSign's rapid DNS updates in .com/.net
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu)
Thu Jul 22 17:46:50 2004
To: Mark Kosters <markk@verisignlabs.com>
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 22 Jul 2004 17:04:24 EDT."
<20040722210424.GB2547@verisignlabs.com>
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2004 17:45:25 -0400
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
--==_Exmh_-1206667686P
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Thu, 22 Jul 2004 17:04:24 EDT, Mark Kosters said:
> Has anyone done any studies to prove this conjecture? If this was
> true, maybe those registries who do perform this particular service today
> ought to slow down their update frequency.
And lose share to the one who doesn't slow down?
I seem to remember the biggest reason for the flood away from the monopoly
registrar when *that* floodgate opened was that the other registrars promised
updates "this day rather than this month".
(And yes, the whole .com/.net/.org/.biz landscape is enough of a mess that the
comment applies to "registries" as well as "registrars" - a local radio station
has 'wrov.cc' because 'wrov.com' is a domain in Korea)...
--==_Exmh_-1206667686P
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001
iD8DBQFBADV1cC3lWbTT17ARAhgFAKDltTusS/MSry/DReXBw4TAvp2AnQCgs/jR
0yZNsI7xxOMnLJ8s5+PFJpQ=
=lOw1
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--==_Exmh_-1206667686P--
