[72676] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: VeriSign's rapid DNS updates in .com/.net

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Mark Kosters)
Thu Jul 22 17:05:59 2004

Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2004 17:04:24 -0400
From: Mark Kosters <markk@verisignlabs.com>
To: Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine <brunner@nic-naa.net>
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <200407222027.i6MKRjOJ068253@nic-naa.net>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu


On Thu, Jul 22, 2004 at 08:27:45PM +0000, Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine wrote:
> > the primary beneficiaries of this
> > new functionality are spammers and other malfeasants,
> 
> I think this is a true statement. 

Has anyone done any studies to prove this conjecture? If this was
true, maybe those registries who do perform this particular service today
ought to slow down their update frequency.

Mark

-- 

Mark Kosters            markk@verisignlabs.com       Verisign Applied Research

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post