[72451] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Spyware becomes increasingly malicious
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Paul Vixie)
Mon Jul 12 17:21:32 2004
From: Paul Vixie <paul@vix.com>
To: nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: Message from Christopher Woodfield <rekoil@semihuman.com>
of "Mon, 12 Jul 2004 14:20:33 -0400."
<29B3E16C-D430-11D8-AADC-0030657A2472@semihuman.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2004 21:20:52 +0000
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
> I think depeering is a bit over the top for this situation, ...
if their customer was sucking blood from your customer, and if your peer
was taking a cut of the proceeds, would the issues be any clearer?
> I guess the big question is, is there anyone (other than those profiting
> directly from CWS) that would complain if a provider were to do such a
> thing...
looks like a psi-net "pink contract" inherited by cogent. but since the
psi->cogent rollup was an asset sale rather than a corporate merger, cogent
probably isn't bound by that contract. somebody needs to get on the phone,
i guess.
