[72450] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Spyware becomes increasingly malicious
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (David A.Ulevitch)
Mon Jul 12 16:39:55 2004
In-Reply-To: <29B3E16C-D430-11D8-AADC-0030657A2472@semihuman.com>
From: David A.Ulevitch <davidu@everydns.net>
Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2004 13:31:18 -0700
To: nanog@merit.edu
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
On Jul 12, 2004, at 11:20 AM, Christopher Woodfield wrote:
> I think depeering is a bit over the top for this situation, but I
> wouldn't blink at nullrouting the prefix in question at my cores... :)
>
> I guess the big question is, is there anyone (other than those
> profiting directly from CWS) that would complain if a provider were to
> do such a thing...
If (your network == your organization) then maybe it's okay, otherwise
I wouldn't consider it.
If your customers demand it then that's something different and as a
provider you can choose to provide this sort of filtering for your
customer.
It's the old: "I don't want some plumber deciding what can come down my
pipe" argument.
-davidu
