[72248] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: concern over public peering points [WAS: Peering point speed

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Laurence F. Sheldon, Jr.)
Sat Jul 3 12:33:49 2004

Date: Sat, 03 Jul 2004 11:31:05 -0500
From: "Laurence F. Sheldon, Jr." <LarrySheldon@cox.net>
To: nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0407031822210.24876-100000@uplift.swm.pp.se>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu


Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:

> On Sat, 3 Jul 2004, Randy Bush wrote:
> 
> 
>>no.  in the first case, you're just hiding the incremental costs.
>>eventually, some bean counter is gonna want to recover them, and
>>then folk get quite unhappy.
> 
> 
> What costs are you referring to? You basically need a few hours time per 
> month from engineers and billing department. This for an exchange that has 
> 20 ISPs connected to it. The amount of traffic isn't really a factor, but 
> the one I know of and am part of running carries multi-gigabit.

Does the person that sweeps the floor do so for free?  And supply the
broom?

-- 
Requiescas in pace o email

Ex turpi causa non oritur actio

http://members.cox.net/larrysheldon/



home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post