[72247] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: concern over public peering points [WAS: Peering point speed

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Mikael Abrahamsson)
Sat Jul 3 12:26:33 2004

Date: Sat, 3 Jul 2004 18:25:57 +0200 (CEST)
From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se>
To: nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <16614.56500.866797.879799@ran.psg.com>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu


On Sat, 3 Jul 2004, Randy Bush wrote:

> no.  in the first case, you're just hiding the incremental costs.
> eventually, some bean counter is gonna want to recover them, and
> then folk get quite unhappy.

What costs are you referring to? You basically need a few hours time per 
month from engineers and billing department. This for an exchange that has 
20 ISPs connected to it. The amount of traffic isn't really a factor, but 
the one I know of and am part of running carries multi-gigabit.

-- 
Mikael Abrahamsson    email: swmike@swm.pp.se


home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post