[71396] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: QOD: Which is worse - Spam or Attacks?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Pete)
Sun Jun 13 21:04:16 2004
From: "Pete" <crossfire@smsonline.net>
To: "Tom Scholl" <tscholl@packetheads.org>
Cc: "NANOG" <nanog@merit.edu>
Date: Sun, 13 Jun 2004 21:02:36 -0400
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
> >
> > So, I put these question on the floor . . .
> >
> > How is it that a small web-hosting ISP can be condemned for not
> > handling their clientele as spammers. On the otherhand
> > the "fat-dog" ISP's can blantantly state that they deny access and
> > using misleading information are not held to the same standards. And
> > in-fact are not even using any port filtering to prevent their clients
> > from infecting the world?
>
> http://puck.nether.net/netops/nocs.cgi?ispname=sbc
>
> 877 588-1316
>
> Does this not work?
> NOC != abuse department.
Nope it sure doesn't!
>
> I believe SBC is filtering atleast 4 TCP ports on their DSL customers
> (135, 139, 445 and 1025).
>
http://puck.nether.net/netops/nocs.cgi?ispname=sbc is BOGUS Info as far as
SBC goes, just like I said it was, try t yourself and see how far you get.
SBC's peering is in the MAE's, Ashburn and PAIX sure aren't filtered [:-(]
very well.
