[69873] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: why use IPv6, was: Lazy network operators
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Kurt Erik Lindqvist)
Wed Apr 21 02:48:00 2004
In-Reply-To: <BBBE70FE-9309-11D8-911D-000A95928574@kurtis.pp.se>
Cc: "william(at)elan.net" <william@elan.net>, nanog@merit.edu,
Michel Py <michel@arneill-py.sacramento.ca.us>
From: Kurt Erik Lindqvist <kurtis@kurtis.pp.se>
Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2004 08:47:16 +0200
To: Kurt Erik Lindqvist <kurtis@kurtis.pp.se>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
>> Perhaps ipv6 has some dark spots that may have made upgrading not
>> attractive
>> at this time, but stopping work on it and continuing ipv4 for next 100
>> years
>> is not an option in my view - we just need to put more effort on
>> things
>> like multihoming support for ipv6 (and its not an unsolvable problem,
>> the
>> cell phone companies are somehow able to deal with greatly increasing
>> number
>> of phones and use of cell phones and roaming works quite well, for me
>> almost everywhere at least).
>
> No, it's not an unsolvable problem. The multi6 WG will in a few weeks
> have a architectural analysis draft published, going through the
> various proposals that have been made (and they are a lot). The
> discussion that is due to follow will need all input it can get. I do
> encourage people to subscribe to the mailinglist and join that
> discussion!
As was pointed out to me, I forgot to say how to subscribe :
http://www.ietf.org/html.charters/multi6-charter.html
- - kurtis -
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 8.0.3
iQA/AwUBQIYY96arNKXTPFCVEQL6QACfURBnmYcuW3AKkK9iZv5cKGGpg8wAn2r9
iqUyPzs6GC7qwj/TDr8Ku7E0
=3n0f
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
