[69871] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: why use IPv6, was: Lazy network operators
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Kurt Erik Lindqvist)
Wed Apr 21 02:36:47 2004
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0404181715180.27725-100000@sokol.elan.net>
Cc: nanog@merit.edu, Michel Py <michel@arneill-py.sacramento.ca.us>
From: Kurt Erik Lindqvist <kurtis@kurtis.pp.se>
Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2004 22:31:42 +0200
To: "william(at)elan.net" <william@elan.net>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
As co-chair of the multi6 WG :
On 2004-04-19, at 02.29, william(at)elan.net wrote:
> Perhaps ipv6 has some dark spots that may have made upgrading not
> attractive
> at this time, but stopping work on it and continuing ipv4 for next 100
> years
> is not an option in my view - we just need to put more effort on things
> like multihoming support for ipv6 (and its not an unsolvable problem,
> the
> cell phone companies are somehow able to deal with greatly increasing
> number
> of phones and use of cell phones and roaming works quite well, for me
> almost everywhere at least).
No, it's not an unsolvable problem. The multi6 WG will in a few weeks
have a architectural analysis draft published, going through the
various proposals that have been made (and they are a lot). The
discussion that is due to follow will need all input it can get. I do
encourage people to subscribe to the mailinglist and join that
discussion!
Best regards,
- - kurtis -
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 8.0.3
iQA/AwUBQIWIs6arNKXTPFCVEQLU/wCdFxVLrTswwUL5GQgei+sfuYTJPfwAoNzw
o1GimcbzYp72ngq16PI44Jws
=+GuV
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
