[68308] in North American Network Operators' Group
[Fwd: [alex@yuriev.com] Confirmation of your message requested]
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Laurence F. Sheldon, Jr.)
Mon Mar 8 10:19:48 2004
Date: Mon, 08 Mar 2004 09:19:16 -0600
From: "Laurence F. Sheldon, Jr." <LarrySheldon@cox.net>
To: NANOG <nanog@merit.edu>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------080601070102040504090109
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
quote
Your message to <alex@yuriev.com> was intercepted by an
automated spam reduction system based on TMDA. This happened because your
address has not been previously verified as one used by a human, as opposite
to a bloody idiot-spammer. In order to reduce the amount of junk mail
received by <alex@yuriev.com>, only messages from verified addresses
are released for delivery.
unquote
If you are not going to accept mail from me, do not send mail to me.
Do no spam mw with this crap in any case.
--------------080601070102040504090109
Content-Type: message/rfc822;
name="(null).eml"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline;
filename="(null).eml"
Return-Path: <LarrySheldon@cox.net>
Delivered-To: alex-yuriev-alex@yuriev.com
Received: (qmail 15962 invoked from network); 8 Mar 2004 15:10:37 -0000
Received: from lakemtao08.cox.net (68.1.17.113)
by s2.yuriev.com with SMTP; 8 Mar 2004 15:10:37 -0000
Received: from cox.net ([68.110.29.174]) by lakemtao08.cox.net
(InterMail vM.5.01.06.08 201-253-122-130-108-20031117) with ESMTP
id <20040308151408.UJOE12895.lakemtao08.cox.net@cox.net>
for <alex@yuriev.com>; Mon, 8 Mar 2004 10:14:08 -0500
Message-ID: <404C8DBD.5070605@cox.net>
Date: Mon, 08 Mar 2004 09:14:05 -0600
From: "Laurence F. Sheldon, Jr." <LarrySheldon@cox.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US;
rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (ax)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: alex@yuriev.com
Subject: Re: Source address validation (was Re: UUNet Offer New Protection
Against DDoS)
References: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0403080108410.7788-100000@a.mx.ict1.everquick.net>
<Pine.GSO.4.58.0403072108460.9353@clifden.donelan.com>
<404BDB08.7050104@cox.net> <20040308142150.GA15340@s2.yuriev.com>
In-Reply-To: <20040308142150.GA15340@s2.yuriev.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
alex@yuriev.com wrote:
>>>>SD> They saw no _net_ savings.
>>>>SD>
>>>>SD> In the real world, it costs more to deploy and maintain
>>>>SD> SAV/uRPF.
>>>>
>>>>The benefit is to other networks. When other networks make your
>>>>life easier, you benefit.
>>>
>>>This confirms my statement.
>>
>>How much do you save by putting handrails on your stairways?
>
>
> You avoid costly lawsuits under ADA.
>
> Alex
>
>
>
>
Yes, Mr. Donelan has made it clear that the ONLY reason that matters
for doing the right this is that the law requires you to.
--------------080601070102040504090109--
