[68307] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Source address validation (was Re: UUNet Offer New Protection Against DDoS)
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Henry Linneweh)
Mon Mar 8 10:10:27 2004
Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2004 07:09:50 -0800 (PST)
From: Henry Linneweh <hrlinneweh@sbcglobal.net>
To: nanog-post@rsuc.gweep.net, nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <20040308030301.GA51425@gweep.net>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
--0-582612102-1078758590=:85999
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Here is some insight on this issue
What is Unicast Reverse Path Forwarding (uRPF)? Can a default route 0.0.0.0/0 be used to perform a uRPF check?
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/105/44.html#Q18
-Henry
--0-582612102-1078758590=:85999
Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii
<P><!--StartFragment -->Here is some insight on this issue </P>
<P><B>What is Unicast Reverse Path Forwarding (uRPF)? Can a default route 0.0.0.0/0 be used to perform a uRPF check?</B> </P>
<P><A href="http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/105/44.html#Q18">http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/105/44.html#Q18</A></P>
<P>-Henry</P>
--0-582612102-1078758590=:85999--
